WaveBPS:
Overview
Navigation
Live Capture
Cursors
Importing
Exporting
Decoder Setup
Analysis
Automated Test
Specifications




FlexRay:
Overview
Static Frame
Dynamic Frame
Wakeup

Startup
Physical Layer
Compare to CAN and LIN



CAN Bus:
Overview
Data Frame
Extended Frame
Remote Frame

Error Frame
Bit Stuffing
Physical Layers
Single Wire CAN
Compare to LIN and FlexRay




LIN Bus
Overview
LIN Frame

LIN Header

LIN Slave Part
LIN Errors
Compare to CAN and FlexRay




Others:

Overview
UART: Kline, J1708 and RS232
J1850
SPI
I2C

 


 

DOWNLOAD

 



BUY NOW!

Compare FlexRay, CAN Bus and LIN Bus

 

FlexRay, CAN Bus, and LIN bus are very different protocols and fit very different applications. Therefore, it is very unlikely that any of these protocols will replace the other. For example, the FlexRay protocol was designed for specific time deterministic applications with fault tolerance and may replace CAN in applications such as safety, chassis, and powertrain but not in body or diagnostics.

 

 

CAN and FlexRay Frames


FlexRay is faster than the CAN bus. Here we can see a 32 byte FlexRay 10 MBit frame taking just a fraction of a 500Kbits CAN frame. View a large image.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Policy | Contact

© 2005-2013 Intrepid Control Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

English 日本語/Japanese 汉语/Simplified Chinese